RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/13/2012

Why NOM banned us (and why they'll look terrible if they do so again)

by Jeremy Hooper

The only thing I really care about in terms of the NOM social media fiasco from two days ago? That the NOM forums, which were freed up by whoever accessed the NOM Facebook site, remain open to a version of fair dialogue that NOM has not seen in years.

Screen Shot 2012-04-13 At 12.55.57 Pm
*ignore the superfluous "to" in the last sentence.

Go speak truth to NOM's dwindling power! Facebook wall here.

**Oh, and FYI: You don't have to "like" the page to comment. So don't feel any need to do so.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails