RECENT  POSTS:  » I can't keep pretending to care about [insert activist] saying [insert ridiculous thing] » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/13/2012

Why NOM banned us (and why they'll look terrible if they do so again)

by Jeremy Hooper

The only thing I really care about in terms of the NOM social media fiasco from two days ago? That the NOM forums, which were freed up by whoever accessed the NOM Facebook site, remain open to a version of fair dialogue that NOM has not seen in years.

Screen Shot 2012-04-13 At 12.55.57 Pm
*ignore the superfluous "to" in the last sentence.

Go speak truth to NOM's dwindling power! Facebook wall here.

**Oh, and FYI: You don't have to "like" the page to comment. So don't feel any need to do so.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails