RECENT  POSTS:  » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/13/2012

Why NOM banned us (and why they'll look terrible if they do so again)

by Jeremy Hooper

The only thing I really care about in terms of the NOM social media fiasco from two days ago? That the NOM forums, which were freed up by whoever accessed the NOM Facebook site, remain open to a version of fair dialogue that NOM has not seen in years.

Screen Shot 2012-04-13 At 12.55.57 Pm
*ignore the superfluous "to" in the last sentence.

Go speak truth to NOM's dwindling power! Facebook wall here.

**Oh, and FYI: You don't have to "like" the page to comment. So don't feel any need to do so.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails