RECENT  POSTS:  » Court upholds Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance » Maggie Gallagher won't toast you while you trap your spouse in sin » NOM pre-spins its likely low #March4Marriage attendance » 'Children of gays' lawyer to SCOTUS: Ban same-sex marriage so bisexuals will marry heterosexually » Audio: Ryan T. Anderson says sexual orientation speaks to content of character; links it to sadomasochism, polyamory » WHOA: FRC 'reediting' all those heinous fasting-for-marriage prayers I've been showing you!! » Man who dedicates his life to fighting marriage equality, gay parenting: 'I don't work to harm others' » FRC's eighth day of fasting-for-discrimination: Uses passage about forced drowning to condemn gay parents » NOM: Marriage is some creepy number that looks like it's about to behead one spouse » Desperate anti-gay movement's latest attempt to dehumanize: Gay unions harm straight kids  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/18/2012

FRC Flashback: When national polling was a more convenient selling point

by Jeremy Hooper

I just stumbled on this ad that the Family Research Council's action arm ran in newspapers back in 2004:

Screen Shot 2012-05-18 At 1.54.12 Pm

And I have to wonder, since public opposition was their number one reason for passing a Federal Marriage Amendment back then, what will they say now, should an FMA arise again under a Romney presidency (as he has promised)? I mean, not one credible poll puts America's opposition anywhere close to 64%—all credible polls put the split at near-even, and a growing number put support in the majority.

To me, this sort of flashback shows how much the past decade's rapid tide has surely stunned the "pro-family" world. Back in 2004, they were completely confident in national polling, because they simply could not envision how quickly that polling would turn with every passing year. Opposition was strong and support was tepid. With even one state, Massachusetts, granting equality, most could not envision two states. Or three states. Or six states, the nation's capital, a supportive President and other states and landmark court cases on the horizon. Most on their side were likely confident that backlash would give them fuel.

But now? We know that their overplayed hands actually gave us momentum. Yes, they still manage some "wins" and, yes, they still have plenty of fight left in them. But the "marriage protectors" do not own majority national support, even now. It, their onetime ace in the hole, will never be theirs again, neither to have nor to old.

It must be hard to work on this issue from that perspective, with that reality breathing down your neck.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails