RECENT  POSTS:  » Watch live at 11:30 ET: NOM's hilariously out of touch (and likely final) #March4Marriage » READ: Very anti-gay crew vows to never recognize civil marriage equality (even though they so will or face penalties) » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/11/2012

Judge's views will destroy marriage, predict commentators (of 1926)

by Jeremy Hooper

Judge Ben Lindsey might have been the first on the bench to be accused of "judicial activism" on marriage. An advocate for "companionate marriage," which backed the idea of couples living together in a trial marriage before embarking down the full road, Lindsey's views sparked something of an outrage from the same suspects (priests, "values" lawmakers, concerned groups, the Pope) that greet modern day thinkers on the subject. In fact, the criticisms were so loud and frequent, that they ultimately led to Lindsey's being removed from the bench, with most suggesting that it was the marriage thing that really did him in (see Iowa judicial retention vote of 2010 for modern parallel).

But while most who opined publicly seemed to have been of the view that Lindsey was destroying marriage at the peril of society, there were other public thinkers who were using Lindsey's views to suggest that this "evolving" view of marriage would reform marriage in a positive way, suggesting that the custom was already so tarnished by unfaithful heterosexuals that self-immolation was inevitable. I find this fascinating:

Screen Shot 2012-05-11 At 7.17.42 Am
Screen Shot 2012-05-11 At 7.17.19 Am

There really isn't anything new under the sun, is there?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails