RECENT  POSTS:  » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor » NOM resorts to blatant lying in its 2015 #March4Marriage materials » NOM coalition partner: America will fall unless you March For Marriage » AFA helps SCOTUS see that opposition to *civil* marriage equality is all about religious fervor » Video: Did this Texas 'biblical marriage' rally assemble least diverse crowd in recorded human history?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/11/2012

Judge's views will destroy marriage, predict commentators (of 1926)

by Jeremy Hooper

Judge Ben Lindsey might have been the first on the bench to be accused of "judicial activism" on marriage. An advocate for "companionate marriage," which backed the idea of couples living together in a trial marriage before embarking down the full road, Lindsey's views sparked something of an outrage from the same suspects (priests, "values" lawmakers, concerned groups, the Pope) that greet modern day thinkers on the subject. In fact, the criticisms were so loud and frequent, that they ultimately led to Lindsey's being removed from the bench, with most suggesting that it was the marriage thing that really did him in (see Iowa judicial retention vote of 2010 for modern parallel).

But while most who opined publicly seemed to have been of the view that Lindsey was destroying marriage at the peril of society, there were other public thinkers who were using Lindsey's views to suggest that this "evolving" view of marriage would reform marriage in a positive way, suggesting that the custom was already so tarnished by unfaithful heterosexuals that self-immolation was inevitable. I find this fascinating:

Screen Shot 2012-05-11 At 7.17.42 Am
Screen Shot 2012-05-11 At 7.17.19 Am

There really isn't anything new under the sun, is there?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails