RECENT  POSTS:  » And now in news for the naive: As long as gay scouts are banned, boys won't discuss sex » Supposedly marriage-focused NOM promotes Boy Scouts discrimination » Married gay celeb challenges misconceptions, elementary-level spelling errors » Anita, meet Uma » WaPo poll: Majority of Virginians are for *all* lovers » GLAAD: Equal Scouting opponent says BSA only bans activists; is fibbing » Drug-resistant gonorrhea is a 'wage of sin'? NOM senior staffer 'likes' that » What the Boy Scouts' anti-equality coalition is engendering » Video: French waitress comes out, celebrates marriage equality; your grilled cheese will have to wait » The weirdest anti-gay video you will ever see; I'm serious; guaranteed; just watch  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/15/2012

NOM commenter encourages death to gays

by Jeremy Hooper

You know how I've talked in the past about NOM's commenting system and how it always denies my contributions before they have a chance to go up? Yeah, well—look what the moderator just accepted:

201205152019
[SOURCE: NOM Blog]

Now let me reiterate, objectively: I don't hold websites accountable for comments. I certainly don't support everything that's been written in my comments.

But that said—NOM denies my comments, even if I use email addys that they couldn't possibly know (leaving my name and site info intact). So clearly there is some human moderation going on. So I have to wonder: why is this kind of thing going through, yet benign pro-equality comments are routinely deleted?

Pagebreak-57

*Good News is not an infrequent commenter. Nor is it the first time he or she has hinted at certain penalties. This one, about Dan Savage, has been up for two weeks:

Screen Shot 2012-05-15 At 8.27.06 Pm

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails