RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/03/2012

NOM EXPOSED: What’s NOM’s acceptable comment criteria, exactly?

by Jeremy Hooper

Why does the NOM moderator approve a comment wishing death to Dan Savage yet won't approve my simple pushback? Let's explore:

Nationalorganizationformarriage-36 Despite multiple attempts, never once in the NOM Blog's two or three year history have I had a comment make its way to the site. As both a legally married gay man and as someone who sometimes knows NOM better than the org staffers know it themselves, I've felt that I had insight to add on more than occasion. However, the moderators seem to disagree. My perfectly fair, in no way hostile comments are always moderated away.
KEEP READING: What’s NOM’s acceptable comment criteria, exactly? [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails