RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/04/2012

'Look what we did to Starbucks!' hilariously claims the NOM that did absolutely nothing

by Jeremy Hooper

My husband and I go to Starbucks multiple times a week. Andrew is fanatical about making sure we use his gold card, forcing me to take his iPhone with me just about every time I go so that he can earn his points or starts or whatever. What can I say—for a product he enjoys, my husband is a marketer's dream.

This being the case, we get rewards cards all the time. A free drink here, an extra oatmeal there—Starbucks is forever sending us postcards that entitle us to a free something or other. It's kind of a thing.

But leave it to the ever-duplicitous NOM crowd to now look to a mailer that is making the rounds, geared toward bringing customers into the Gold rewards program, and attempt to claim it as a sign of their failing "Dump Starbucks" boycott's supposed strength:

Screen Shot 2012-06-04 At 5.46.05 Pm
[NOM Blog]

The first thing I would say to NOM is that if Starbucks were to send a $5 gift card to everyone who had signed on to the "Thank Starbucks" counter movement, the company would be mailing out over $3.2 million in gift cards. So let's not make $200k sound like a lot, kids.

But regardless of the numbers, what kind of organization seriously looks to a marketing incentive like this and tries to connect it to its own political cause?! I mean seriously. Isn't that a little big for the britches, even for the paper tiger that is NOM?!

If Starbucks' slate of corporate concerns was a Venti latte, NOM's little boycott would be one half of one sprinkle of the optional cinnamon one might opt to dust on the top. It's cute that they don't know that.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails