RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


'Look what we did to Starbucks!' hilariously claims the NOM that did absolutely nothing

by Jeremy Hooper

My husband and I go to Starbucks multiple times a week. Andrew is fanatical about making sure we use his gold card, forcing me to take his iPhone with me just about every time I go so that he can earn his points or starts or whatever. What can I say—for a product he enjoys, my husband is a marketer's dream.

This being the case, we get rewards cards all the time. A free drink here, an extra oatmeal there—Starbucks is forever sending us postcards that entitle us to a free something or other. It's kind of a thing.

But leave it to the ever-duplicitous NOM crowd to now look to a mailer that is making the rounds, geared toward bringing customers into the Gold rewards program, and attempt to claim it as a sign of their failing "Dump Starbucks" boycott's supposed strength:

Screen Shot 2012-06-04 At 5.46.05 Pm
[NOM Blog]

The first thing I would say to NOM is that if Starbucks were to send a $5 gift card to everyone who had signed on to the "Thank Starbucks" counter movement, the company would be mailing out over $3.2 million in gift cards. So let's not make $200k sound like a lot, kids.

But regardless of the numbers, what kind of organization seriously looks to a marketing incentive like this and tries to connect it to its own political cause?! I mean seriously. Isn't that a little big for the britches, even for the paper tiger that is NOM?!

If Starbucks' slate of corporate concerns was a Venti latte, NOM's little boycott would be one half of one sprinkle of the optional cinnamon one might opt to dust on the top. It's cute that they don't know that.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails