RECENT  POSTS:  » 2006: When Clinton vocally supported her state moving forward w/ marriage equality but Sanders did not » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/28/2012

Minnesota's ballot question: Do citizens wish to 'limit' freedom?

by Jeremy Hooper

For LGBT people and pro-equality allies, a loss would certainly feel like more than a limitation. That is, however, the language we're going with:

(ABC 6 News) -- [Minnesota] Secretary of State Mark Ritchie is announcing the title of the marriage amendment that is set to appear on the ballot in November.

It will be called "LIMITING THE STATUS OF MARRIAGE TO OPPOSITE SEX COUPLES."
Gay Marriage Amendment Ballot Title Announced [KAAL TV]

Speed = something the law should limit. But love? It can handle the acceleration!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails