RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/28/2012

Minnesota's ballot question: Do citizens wish to 'limit' freedom?

by Jeremy Hooper

For LGBT people and pro-equality allies, a loss would certainly feel like more than a limitation. That is, however, the language we're going with:

(ABC 6 News) -- [Minnesota] Secretary of State Mark Ritchie is announcing the title of the marriage amendment that is set to appear on the ballot in November.

It will be called "LIMITING THE STATUS OF MARRIAGE TO OPPOSITE SEX COUPLES."
Gay Marriage Amendment Ballot Title Announced [KAAL TV]

Speed = something the law should limit. But love? It can handle the acceleration!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails