RECENT  POSTS:  » GOP pollster Luntz to Heritage Foundation's Anderson: 'Gay marriage is harmless' » Read: Federal court judge rules against Colorado's discriminatory marriage ban » You guys, will you please pipe down so Sen. Rubio can dismantle your deserved freedoms? » 'Mask is coming off' LGBTs, says man who vowed to export and/or criminalize LGBTs » Exxon, infamous holdout on fair and decent employment protections, could be running out of options » Oregon baker who refused same-sex wedding cake bakes for 'ex-gay' org » PFOX rebrands; into group play, seemingly » Audio: Listen to this ADF spinmeister and his anti-gay spin » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/28/2012

Minnesota's ballot question: Do citizens wish to 'limit' freedom?

by Jeremy Hooper

For LGBT people and pro-equality allies, a loss would certainly feel like more than a limitation. That is, however, the language we're going with:

(ABC 6 News) -- [Minnesota] Secretary of State Mark Ritchie is announcing the title of the marriage amendment that is set to appear on the ballot in November.

It will be called "LIMITING THE STATUS OF MARRIAGE TO OPPOSITE SEX COUPLES."
Gay Marriage Amendment Ballot Title Announced [KAAL TV]

Speed = something the law should limit. But love? It can handle the acceleration!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails