RECENT  POSTS:  » And now in news for the naive: As long as gay scouts are banned, boys won't discuss sex » Supposedly marriage-focused NOM promotes Boy Scouts discrimination » Married gay celeb challenges misconceptions, elementary-level spelling errors » Anita, meet Uma » WaPo poll: Majority of Virginians are for *all* lovers » GLAAD: Equal Scouting opponent says BSA only bans activists; is fibbing » Drug-resistant gonorrhea is a 'wage of sin'? NOM senior staffer 'likes' that » What the Boy Scouts' anti-equality coalition is engendering » Video: French waitress comes out, celebrates marriage equality; your grilled cheese will have to wait » The weirdest anti-gay video you will ever see; I'm serious; guaranteed; just watch  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/27/2012

Minnesota For Marriage, in PR spin mode, begins deleting comments, banning users

by Jeremy Hooper

Minnesota for Marriage continues to claim it was the victim of the oddest and most specifically limited hacking attack in recent memory. Few believe their story.

So what is MN For Marriage now doing? Well, doing what the "pro-family" movement always does: deleting comments and banning users.

This is the comment that got me banned. The "50" refers to the MN For Marriage supporters who "liked" the Leviticus comment before it was deleted; the Pastors For Marriage thing refers to this post; the inflated GM protest is referenced here:

Screen Shot 2012-06-27 At 2.18.50 Pm

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails