RECENT  POSTS:  » #RFRA and a movement that shirks responsibility (almost) as much as it shirks equality » Audio: Limbaugh admits #RFRA fight is about same-sex marriage; links homosexuality to bestiality » Sen Schumer, federal #RFRA coauthor, knocks down lie that Indiana's version is the same » Video: I can't fathom invoking concentration camps in my political discourse. But Glenn Beck on the other hand... » Get a load of this double-talk from the Family Research Council #RFRA #Indiana » NOM admits 'religious freedom' bills are about discriminating against same-sex couples; thanks, NOM » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/27/2012

Minnesota For Marriage, in PR spin mode, begins deleting comments, banning users

by Jeremy Hooper

Minnesota for Marriage continues to claim it was the victim of the oddest and most specifically limited hacking attack in recent memory. Few believe their story.

So what is MN For Marriage now doing? Well, doing what the "pro-family" movement always does: deleting comments and banning users.

This is the comment that got me banned. The "50" refers to the MN For Marriage supporters who "liked" the Leviticus comment before it was deleted; the Pastors For Marriage thing refers to this post; the inflated GM protest is referenced here:

Screen Shot 2012-06-27 At 2.18.50 Pm

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails