RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/11/2012

NOM's Peters worries Webster might marry 'em; too late

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters is appalled that anyone would want Merriam-Webster to include same-sex couples in its definition of marriage:


*AUDIO SOURCE: [National Catholic Register Radio]

I'm appalled too, but only because I hate to see people wasting time on something that's already been accomplished:

201206111155
[
Merriam-Webster]

So basically, it's the social conservatives who are now redefining the word whenever they strip same-sex couples out of it. Score one for vocabulary!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails