RECENT  POSTS:  » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/11/2012

NOM's Peters worries Webster might marry 'em; too late

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters is appalled that anyone would want Merriam-Webster to include same-sex couples in its definition of marriage:


*AUDIO SOURCE: [National Catholic Register Radio]

I'm appalled too, but only because I hate to see people wasting time on something that's already been accomplished:

201206111155
[
Merriam-Webster]

So basically, it's the social conservatives who are now redefining the word whenever they strip same-sex couples out of it. Score one for vocabulary!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails