RECENT  POSTS:  » FRC senior staffer: 'Ex-Gays: The Best Kept Secret in Your Child’s School' » Video: In inclusive ad, AZ Sec. of State hopeful makes discrimination his rival » That discriminatory OR baker is really overthinking reason why she's national news » Robert Oscar Lopez confirms belief that gay parents are like slave owners » Video: Values Voter Summit marriage panel was particularly boring, bad, ineffective this year » Conservative Catholic professor: Gay activists like segregationists in 'single-minded heedlessness' » Stop claiming Biden, Obama, Clinton, et al. supported marriage amendments—they did not. » Audio: Peter LaBarbera attempts to deny 'hate' by repeating his extremely hateful quote » Duggars promote discriminatory bakers, improper pluralization » AFA's Fischer links 'raping puppy' headline to sexual orientation, 'born this way' arguments  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/11/2012

NOM's Peters worries Webster might marry 'em; too late

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters is appalled that anyone would want Merriam-Webster to include same-sex couples in its definition of marriage:


*AUDIO SOURCE: [National Catholic Register Radio]

I'm appalled too, but only because I hate to see people wasting time on something that's already been accomplished:

201206111155
[
Merriam-Webster]

So basically, it's the social conservatives who are now redefining the word whenever they strip same-sex couples out of it. Score one for vocabulary!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails