RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/11/2012

NOM's Peters worries Webster might marry 'em; too late

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters is appalled that anyone would want Merriam-Webster to include same-sex couples in its definition of marriage:


*AUDIO SOURCE: [National Catholic Register Radio]

I'm appalled too, but only because I hate to see people wasting time on something that's already been accomplished:

201206111155
[
Merriam-Webster]

So basically, it's the social conservatives who are now redefining the word whenever they strip same-sex couples out of it. Score one for vocabulary!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails