RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/27/2012

Warning, #MNUnited: Minnesota For Marriage has invisible supporters detectable by only their own eyes!

by Jeremy Hooper

This KARE video report puts the number at three dozen. KAAL puts it at 50-75. MPR says fifty. And my own photos (and on-site onlookers) from the event top it out at forty, maybe, if you include the many children.

But leave it to the reliably deceptive opposition to just say whatever the heck they want in order to create a false reality:

Screen Shot 2012-06-27 At 9.00.08 Am

Hundreds? Not one single reporter puts it at even 100, much less hundreds with an "s"!

Then again, this is the also the crowd that looks at discrimination and calls it "family values." Perhaps accurate labeling would be the real surprise.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails