RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/27/2012

Warning, #MNUnited: Minnesota For Marriage has invisible supporters detectable by only their own eyes!

by Jeremy Hooper

This KARE video report puts the number at three dozen. KAAL puts it at 50-75. MPR says fifty. And my own photos (and on-site onlookers) from the event top it out at forty, maybe, if you include the many children.

But leave it to the reliably deceptive opposition to just say whatever the heck they want in order to create a false reality:

Screen Shot 2012-06-27 At 9.00.08 Am

Hundreds? Not one single reporter puts it at even 100, much less hundreds with an "s"!

Then again, this is the also the crowd that looks at discrimination and calls it "family values." Perhaps accurate labeling would be the real surprise.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails