RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/27/2012

Warning, #MNUnited: Minnesota For Marriage has invisible supporters detectable by only their own eyes!

by Jeremy Hooper

This KARE video report puts the number at three dozen. KAAL puts it at 50-75. MPR says fifty. And my own photos (and on-site onlookers) from the event top it out at forty, maybe, if you include the many children.

But leave it to the reliably deceptive opposition to just say whatever the heck they want in order to create a false reality:

Screen Shot 2012-06-27 At 9.00.08 Am

Hundreds? Not one single reporter puts it at even 100, much less hundreds with an "s"!

Then again, this is the also the crowd that looks at discrimination and calls it "family values." Perhaps accurate labeling would be the real surprise.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails