RECENT  POSTS:  » 'WaPo' conservative columnist: 'Strident' marriage equality opponents have lost » If John Eastman's allowed to intervene in Oregon, I submit his endorsement of this very anti-gay book » I apparently can fly; cool, I've always wanted to! » Starving selves to stop others' happiness: Virginia edition » NOM-aligned organization claims God will soon punish us for pro-equality rulings » GLAAD: The rise of toxic terminology: Losing anti-LGBT movement turns to corrosive labeling » Founder of anti-gay Boy Scouts alternative links sexual orientation, adultery; earns merit badge in ill-intended comparisons » 'Playbill' to let the two previously unaware playgoers in on Broadway's love for gays » New record: Anti-gay activist Ralph Reed contradicts self in less than minute » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/27/2012

Warning, #MNUnited: Minnesota For Marriage has invisible supporters detectable by only their own eyes!

by Jeremy Hooper

This KARE video report puts the number at three dozen. KAAL puts it at 50-75. MPR says fifty. And my own photos (and on-site onlookers) from the event top it out at forty, maybe, if you include the many children.

But leave it to the reliably deceptive opposition to just say whatever the heck they want in order to create a false reality:

Screen Shot 2012-06-27 At 9.00.08 Am

Hundreds? Not one single reporter puts it at even 100, much less hundreds with an "s"!

Then again, this is the also the crowd that looks at discrimination and calls it "family values." Perhaps accurate labeling would be the real surprise.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails