RECENT  POSTS:  » Your anti-LGBT movement at work: Viciously denigrating stock photos of gay families » Maggie Gallagher's latest shows what a disservice she did to the *civil* marriage debate » Brian Brown apparently buying a new dinette set, misapplies purchase to marriage debate » Focus on the Family: Marriage equality activists are 'tyrants'; opponents are 'slaves' » Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination » God Hates Fads: Radical Bay State group pretends homosexuality is like skinny jeans » But does the Archbishop even believe in gay? » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/03/2012

Four-timed married Limbaugh fears my one union will lead to man-on-dog weddings

by Jeremy Hooper
"Marriage is a word. Marriage is an institution. It has a definition. It is the union of Screen Shot 2012-07-03 At 2.08.12 Pm one man and one woman. That's what marriage is. Now, some people think that it is discriminatory because two women can't get married or two men can't get married so we're gonna change what marriage is for whatever reasons, economic, hospital visit, benefits, whatever it is. So marriage is now gonna be not a union of a man and a woman. It's going to be between two men, two women. Well, since we're changing the definition of marriage, what is to prevent three people from getting married? We made this prediction. What if somebody wants to marry their pet dog? Once you change the definition of the word -- you know, words mean things."

Rush Limbaugh

Yup, Rush—words have meaning. Words like "till death do us part," right?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails