RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/02/2012

FRC: General Mills said 'marriage is bad for business'; Reality: No, General Mills didn't. At all. Not even a little bit.

by Jeremy Hooper

The whole thing's ridiculous, but particularly focus on the line I've highlighted:

Screen Shot 2012-07-02 At 6.01.49 Pm
[Family Research Council]

Now I know the social conservatives are desperate to position their stance as being nothing more than support for marriage, but this one is just crazy. General Mills came out against an amendment that would limit marriages. One would assume that this means the company would like to see more marriages—marriages for not only their opposite-sex-partnered customers, but also those who are in love with someone of the same gender. More marriages, not less.

What most pro-equality companies believe is that discrimination is bad. Not just bad for business, but bad for society (or even bad for business, as some pro-equality companies have admitted that their principled stance might hurt their bottom lines). Companies like General Mills stand up because they are of this world and they know that LGBT people are as well. Groups like Family Research Council don't have to support this, the reality of our world. However, they will be the ones gunning for any kinds of marriages, not those of us on the side of freedom. The rhetorical sleight of hand will not alter the truth.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails