RECENT  POSTS:  » Wall Street's biggest put stock in equal bonds » Gross: Tony Perkins makes some sort of 'ugly baby' joke at Hillary Clinton's expense » Really, suddenly contrite Ben Carson? Because you were pretty cocksure before! » ADF links A-Rod's drug suspension with florist's anti-gay discrimination; huh?! » NOM: Marriage means putting choking hazards on your baby's toes » Video: Ben Carson is apparently one felony conviction away from fellating a man » NOM to gay families: Your relationships are 'simply about adult sexual desires' » Maggie Gallagher's new gig » How do you even talk with a movement that insists we 'cannot coexist'? » Sen. Manchin picks odd way to (D-istinguish) himself  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/30/2012

NOM ally Mike Huckabee doesn't support NOM's Starbucks boycott

by Jeremy Hooper

From Focus on the Family's Citizenlink:

MIKE HUCKABEE: Instead of having an honest, rational, intellectually sound discussion about whether the COO of a company should be able to make statements, whether it’s Dan Cathy at Chick-fil-A or Howard Schultz at Starbucks — which I think is fine. If Howard Schultz wants to make statements, that’s fine. Let him do it. I’m not going to go asking for a boycott of Starbucks. This is a marketplace. If Starbucks starts writing on the side of every cup ‘We Don’t Like Christians,” then I’d have to look at it differently. But Starbucks sells coffee. Chick-fil-A sells chicken. The point of view of its senior executives and their founders is frankly their business. I just find this level of trying to destroy people’s jobs and livelihoods because they don’t agree with them — that’s very troubling, and it gets to the very heart of a kind of America that’s very different than the one we grew up with.
[SOURCE]

I actually agree with Huckabee here. As I've been saying all along, the outspoken companies on our side (Amazon, Starbucks, Google, Microsoft, J.C. Penny, Home Depot, Facebook, Orbitz, etc.) always *do* stand their ground, even when challenged. What those of us on this side of the Chick-fil-A debate is for Dan Cathy and the company to simply own the comments (e.g. "shaking fist at God"; "judgment": "deprived mind" etc) and actions (donations, bans at WinShape retreat) that they have chosen to put on record rather than twisting it into just being about "defending marriage" (or shooting the messenger).

The major thing here is that the National Organization for Marriage's ally in this Chick-fil-A brouhaha and partner in an upcoming conservative event, Mike Huckabee, just came out against NOM's boycotts of both General Mills and Starbucks. As someone who has never called for a boycott of Chick-fil-A, I too am *TOTALLY* comfortable with letting the marketplaces of both ideas and business play out as they will. Mike Huckabee just needs to be honest about the true nature of this conversation

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails