RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/19/2012

You *will not* believe the latest from NOM's Ruth Institute! (or on second thought, maybe you will)

by Jeremy Hooper

Of course the NOM/Ruth writer completely ignores what Dan Cathy actually said to stir such outrage:

DAN CATHY: (1:05)"…I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say 'we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage' and I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about"


AUDIO SOURCE: Dan Cathy [Ken Coleman Show]

Instead, "JThieme" focuses only on the more benign Baptist Press comments and uses them to lay a whole host of charges at our feet. Charges that the body of facts cannot back up, despite how deliberately provocative the words with which she chooses to convey them:

Screen Shot 2012-07-19 At 5.04.28 Pm-1
[SOURCE: Ruth Blog]

*WE* (who are conveniently and errantly branded as "the left") cast him as the villain?! My first post on this subject—which, again, is what started this whole thing—consisted of almost no editorializing. It was literally just a short intro, the audio clip, and then an open question about if this might turn off customers. That was it. Any casting was done by Mr. Cathy himself.

But that (i.e the factual data) doesn't matter to an organization like NOM's Ruth Institute. Since those of us who live in LGBT existences (rather than spend our days casting stones at them) chose to have an opinion about Mr. Cathy's own public statements, we are now painted as mean to this rich corporate executive, contemptuous for all of the hetero-headed families that make up our communities and lives, whiners who are unharmed by the sort of culture where people accuse us of "shaking our fist" at God, and out only to serve our own base interests (page views, website hits, etc.). Somehow we are again the ones being nasty and inhospitable, even though we are the ones being denigrated as bringing forth judgment onto this nation via nothing more than our love!

Good grief, anti-LGBT movement: LEARN. TO. TAKE. SOME. RESPONSIBILITY. Have opinions—have at it. But stop shirking everything that comes your way!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails