RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Hey, Focus on the Family's Citizenlink—get your egos out of our marriage equality! » Video: Hallmark features openly in love couple (who happen to be lesbians) » NOM's 'International Org. For Marriage' gets an Executive Director » FRC prays for judges, governors, legislators to ignore marriage equality rulings » Read: AFA plays innocent about making Bryan Fischer a known pundit; no one's buying it » Yes you will coexist with civil marriage equality, Tony Perkins; that's a demand, not a request » Report: The AFA has fired Bryan Fischer as Director of Issue Analysis » Video: These Alabama anti-gay protestors sound exactly like parody versions of Alabama anti-gay protestors » Audio: Activist judge Roy Moore gives rambling, unconvincing interview to Tony Perkins » NOM reveals plan for taking people's money even though they've clearly lost  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/30/2012

Administering wrong-headed religious tests, unwilling to be receptive student

by Jeremy Hooper

Here is an example of the flawed arguments that permeate (define?) the "protect marriage" movement. This one was found on Protect Marriage Maine's Facebook wall:

201208300924

A couple of things.

(1) Marriage vows are not required to be read in public in a way that invokes God. However, a civil marriage license (i.e. what the marriage equality movement is seeking) is required of any couple of any religious view that wishes to have state/federal recognition. This is not up for debate. This is fact.

(2) If you feel so strongly about adultery, then push for laws that inscribe these religious beliefs into wall. Expressly ban this kind of behavior, if that is your goal. Create multi-million dollar campaigns built around this matter. Write Biblical condemnations of adultery into law, if you think you can muster public support for that one. But the fact of the matter is this is not happening AT ALL while billions have been spent over the past decade for the sole purpose of stopping or eliminating civil marriage rights for same-sex couples.


If the other side wants to help us build a stronger coalition of fairness-minded, church/state-separated citizens, then they can keep on with this religious insistence. Please. I beg them to. The truth: it is an untenable, aggressively misrepresentative holdout that will ultimately bring full equality to all fifty states.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails