RECENT  POSTS:  » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/30/2012

Administering wrong-headed religious tests, unwilling to be receptive student

by Jeremy Hooper

Here is an example of the flawed arguments that permeate (define?) the "protect marriage" movement. This one was found on Protect Marriage Maine's Facebook wall:

201208300924

A couple of things.

(1) Marriage vows are not required to be read in public in a way that invokes God. However, a civil marriage license (i.e. what the marriage equality movement is seeking) is required of any couple of any religious view that wishes to have state/federal recognition. This is not up for debate. This is fact.

(2) If you feel so strongly about adultery, then push for laws that inscribe these religious beliefs into wall. Expressly ban this kind of behavior, if that is your goal. Create multi-million dollar campaigns built around this matter. Write Biblical condemnations of adultery into law, if you think you can muster public support for that one. But the fact of the matter is this is not happening AT ALL while billions have been spent over the past decade for the sole purpose of stopping or eliminating civil marriage rights for same-sex couples.


If the other side wants to help us build a stronger coalition of fairness-minded, church/state-separated citizens, then they can keep on with this religious insistence. Please. I beg them to. The truth: it is an untenable, aggressively misrepresentative holdout that will ultimately bring full equality to all fifty states.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails