RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/08/2012

Just an FYI to Minnesota For Marriage (subject: stock photo bride)

by Jeremy Hooper

Back in 2010, the bride you are using to oppose civil marriage equality….

Screen Shot 2012-08-08 At 11.10.48 Am

…went on record with me to say that gays are unhealthy, unproductive, and going to hell:

201208081202

The bride (who did ask to remain nameless) is of course free to say as much as she wants, and Minnesota For Marriage is of course free to use her as the poster spouse for "traditional marriage" advocacy. I just thought you'd like to know that for many of us, this picture is worth a thousand words, 3/4 of which are uber-condemnatory.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails