RECENT  POSTS:  » I can't keep pretending to care about [insert activist] saying [insert ridiculous thing] » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/13/2012

NOM, Family Leader to politicize another judicial retention vote simply b/c they don't agree w/ ruling

by Jeremy Hooper

Here we go again. Bob Vander Plaats, Brian Brown, and all of the rest of the folks who think that Iowa's courts should be shaped by mountains of (largely) out-of-state money are gearing up to oust yet another one of the unanimous panel of Supreme Court judges who backed marriage equality for same-sex couples:

To kick off the campaign, Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage pledged that his organization would provide a match of up to $100,000 the contributions that are made during the next two weeks.
Campaign launched to oust high court justice [Quad-City Times]

And just like last time, this so-called Iowans For Freedom coalition is (a) likely to be successful for the reasons I've laid out before, but (b) their "success" will change absolutely nothing regarding marriage equality in Iowa.

Let's call this what it is: A naked ploy to draw social conservatives to the polls, to raise money and build lists for socially conservative groups like NOM, and to give the illusion of momentum to those who the anti-equality voices have convinced are the "victims" in this whole debate over basic fairness. This is a disturbingly political effort masking as fairness. As populism. As democracy. As freedom.

But hey, don't worry Iowa—you still have two other branches of government that the social conservatives have yet to target for cynical, divisive gain.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails