RECENT  POSTS:  » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/21/2012

Photo: See, discrimination isn't all MN For Marriage has to offer

by Jeremy Hooper

The campaign to alter Minnesota's most precious governing document so that it specifically bans same-gender couples has a new offer for locals:

Screen Shot 2012-08-21 At 2.05.41 Pm

Oh wow—they really think they are on the side of romance. Someone should tell them.

And what's with the "she said 'yes!'" line? Can't the woman ever ask the man? Seriously, MN For Marriage—Isn't it enough for you to be antiquated on the subject of gender as it pertains to two brides or two grooms? Must you also be regressive on the subject of which gender is "allowed" to propose?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails