RECENT  POSTS:  » Court upholds Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance » Maggie Gallagher won't toast you while you trap your spouse in sin » NOM pre-spins its likely low #March4Marriage attendance » 'Children of gays' lawyer to SCOTUS: Ban same-sex marriage so bisexuals will marry heterosexually » Audio: Ryan T. Anderson says sexual orientation speaks to content of character; links it to sadomasochism, polyamory » WHOA: FRC 'reediting' all those heinous fasting-for-marriage prayers I've been showing you!! » Man who dedicates his life to fighting marriage equality, gay parenting: 'I don't work to harm others' » FRC's eighth day of fasting-for-discrimination: Uses passage about forced drowning to condemn gay parents » NOM: Marriage is some creepy number that looks like it's about to behead one spouse » Desperate anti-gay movement's latest attempt to dehumanize: Gay unions harm straight kids  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/21/2012

Photo: See, discrimination isn't all MN For Marriage has to offer

by Jeremy Hooper

The campaign to alter Minnesota's most precious governing document so that it specifically bans same-gender couples has a new offer for locals:

Screen Shot 2012-08-21 At 2.05.41 Pm

Oh wow—they really think they are on the side of romance. Someone should tell them.

And what's with the "she said 'yes!'" line? Can't the woman ever ask the man? Seriously, MN For Marriage—Isn't it enough for you to be antiquated on the subject of gender as it pertains to two brides or two grooms? Must you also be regressive on the subject of which gender is "allowed" to propose?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails