RECENT  POSTS:  » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/21/2012

Photo: See, discrimination isn't all MN For Marriage has to offer

by Jeremy Hooper

The campaign to alter Minnesota's most precious governing document so that it specifically bans same-gender couples has a new offer for locals:

Screen Shot 2012-08-21 At 2.05.41 Pm

Oh wow—they really think they are on the side of romance. Someone should tell them.

And what's with the "she said 'yes!'" line? Can't the woman ever ask the man? Seriously, MN For Marriage—Isn't it enough for you to be antiquated on the subject of gender as it pertains to two brides or two grooms? Must you also be regressive on the subject of which gender is "allowed" to propose?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails