RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/21/2012

Photo: See, discrimination isn't all MN For Marriage has to offer

by Jeremy Hooper

The campaign to alter Minnesota's most precious governing document so that it specifically bans same-gender couples has a new offer for locals:

Screen Shot 2012-08-21 At 2.05.41 Pm

Oh wow—they really think they are on the side of romance. Someone should tell them.

And what's with the "she said 'yes!'" line? Can't the woman ever ask the man? Seriously, MN For Marriage—Isn't it enough for you to be antiquated on the subject of gender as it pertains to two brides or two grooms? Must you also be regressive on the subject of which gender is "allowed" to propose?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails