RECENT  POSTS:  » Riiiiiiight, FRC. And 'Desperate Housewives' is still TV's hot new show, too » After death do us part: Indignity of Idaho's marriage ban threatens lesbian veteran's final wishes » NOM's Chair to Oregon: We have a right to tell courts our personal, conservative Catholic opinions! » Nice try, anti-equality movement, but the lesbian 'throuple' story makes our argument, not yours » Jonah Goldberg can't see the hornets' nest for its hornets » Video: Male on mail » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/21/2012

Photo: See, discrimination isn't all MN For Marriage has to offer

by Jeremy Hooper

The campaign to alter Minnesota's most precious governing document so that it specifically bans same-gender couples has a new offer for locals:

Screen Shot 2012-08-21 At 2.05.41 Pm

Oh wow—they really think they are on the side of romance. Someone should tell them.

And what's with the "she said 'yes!'" line? Can't the woman ever ask the man? Seriously, MN For Marriage—Isn't it enough for you to be antiquated on the subject of gender as it pertains to two brides or two grooms? Must you also be regressive on the subject of which gender is "allowed" to propose?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails