RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/17/2012

Ruth Institute blogger: My instinct was tolerance until far-right talking points duped me

by Jeremy Hooper

This is truly sad to read. Blogger Jennifer Thieme, who has become one of the most prolific voices speaking for the National Organization for Marriage's Ruth Institute, has a new post where she admits that she did not personally vote for Proposition 8 back in '08 because she saw marriage for same-sex couples as mostly benign and lacking impact on her own life. But then she started listening to (and now reciting) the same flawed talking points about reproduction that we gay people have been hearing for decades now, and now she is not only in support of Prop 8 but is actually an advocate for persuading others to support this form of discrimination as well.

Snip and full piece:

On the surface I will be the first to admit that it does seem rather benign. Who cares what goes on in the privacy of others’ bedrooms? I don’t. But when we dig a little deeper, we find something quite harmful and offensive. If you’re a libertarian at heart and a biological parent you will completely understand what I am about to say.

The thing I now find so highly offensive about granting gays the marital status is that it requires the replacement of a natural, pre-political institution for a legal one. This institution is called parenthood.

FULL: My Little Prop 8 Secret – and Why I Would Vote Yes On It Today [Ruth Institute]

It's of course rare that we see the trend lines pointed in this direction. Typically, we hear of folks who has been misled by "values" advocacy and hackneyed non sequiturs before having a lightbulb moment that brought them over to the fair-minded side of history. Thankfully, Ms. Thieme's story of becoming someone who sees gays as capable of destroying parenthood is a rare one.

But it's a story nonetheless. If anything, Ms. Thieme's story shows us that there is a definite, deliberate playbook on the other side—and it highlights our need to dismantle it!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails