RECENT  POSTS:  » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/07/2012

The dangerous new idea NOM is pushing to defame pro-equality voices

by Jeremy Hooper

For years the NOM crowd, led by the "protect marriage" movement's messaging strategist Maggie Gallagher, has been pushing the idea that those who oppose marriage equality will be treated like bigots. But now check this. Over on the blog, the National Organization For Marriage writer (Thomas Peters or someone else) is helping foster a truly chilling new meme that says a second term for pro-equality President Obama will lead the everyday same-sex marriage opponent to be treated as an "enemy of the state":

Screen Shot 2012-08-07 At 10.19.01 Am
[NOM Blog]

It's of course enraging to see how frequently and unashamedly those on the side of civil discrimination seize the "victim" role. But in this one, there is something even more unsavory. If they are the "enemies of the state" then that means the people on the other "side" of this fear-mongering are operating as some sort of evil monolith that is disconnecting citizens from their patriotic embrace of this country and its values. That is a lofty charge—one that weakened the debate, yes, but a negligent one that is also bound to cultivate abject hate (a word I don't use lightly) among the most fringe thinkers once they feel they are out of options.

There are good people having public conversations about this matter of civil fairness/limitation. We should all demand an immediate end to this nakedly provocative attempt to stir up animus.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails