RECENT  POSTS:  » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/23/2012

Video: Ever-deceptive NOM reposts Savage/Brown debate vid

by Jeremy Hooper

If you go to the original source video that was uploaded by its creators, the National Organization For Marriage and its president are getting hammered hard. A good 95% or more of the 1,311 comments on the Brian Brown/Dan Savage debate video are pro-equality, with many pointing out specific flaws in Brian's argument. Dan is favored by a sweeping margin.

So what did NOM do? Well, in its reliably deceptive fervor, the anti-equality organization ripped the source vid, added its own website branding to it, and reposted the thing to YouTube so that they could direct their followers to the "new" vid rather than the one where robust debate has been happening for the past twenty-four hours.

Original:

Screen Shot 2012-08-23 At 8.17.14 Am

NOM's newly branded upload, to which staffers are now directing their supporters in obvious hope that they can flood the "new" clip with comments supporting their agenda:

Screen Shot 2012-08-23 At 8.16.12 Am

There was absolutely no reason to repost, which only dilutes the original, fractures viewership, and gets in the way of group discussion. In fact, NOM linked to the source clip all day yesterday. But since that clip is virtually devoid of any support for the NOM position (quite literally) and nothing looks to be changing that reality, NOM had to do something to try to to stem the tide. They had to create a new reality. So the answer? Rip and repost as if the other never happened.

Nothing but shady, this crew.

Pagebreak-142

*UPDATE: I didn't notice it the first time around, but NOM has also embedded a link to their related "Marriage Anti-Defamation ALliance" video within this "new" debate clip. So that's another reason why they reposted—so they could use this version as a self-promoting vehicle that highlights other NOM properties.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails