RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years » Video: Mississippian who made soldier his lifestyle choice seeks freedom based on unchosen orientation » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/29/2012

What the 'real' Romney marriage can teach Americans about marriage equality (yes, really)

by Jeremy Hooper

In light of Ann Romney's speech last night and it's focus on what she called their "real" marriage, I thought this would be worth reposting. First the news account of their 1969 union:

201208071720

Why did Ann Davies and Mitt Romney start with a civil ceremony? Well, because the new couple wanted state and federal recognition. They had secured the license (step one), so the only thing that was really required of them, in terms of the law, was a civil solemnization (step two). This solemnization does not require faith. In fact, it can happen in one's own home.

The Romneys then opted to take a flight and follow up the civil component with a Mormon ceremony (from which Ann's non-LDS parents were barred), since they are people of faith. The couple had every right to utilize this option—many, many Americans do. But the fact of the matter is that Ann and Mitt were civilly married on that spring 1969 day right there in the Davies' home. In terms of rights, they were just as married before they boarded that Salt Lake–bound flight as they were after their Tabernacle-set rites.

Civil marriage is what we marriage equality activists are seeking. The religious ceremony (step three; optional) and its governance is to be left to the vast array of individual faith groups that make up this fabric. The decision to fly to your nearest house of worship is always a choice.Before the GOP nominee cedes too much ground to the "protect marriage" evangelicals and Catholics who always—always, always—use faith against gay people's CIVIL rights, I'd ask him to take an honest look at his own pre-boarding activity from forty-three years ago.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails