RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet' » Video: Tony Perkins for politically-driven pastors to test (if not run afoul) tax exempt status » Ruth Institute (former NOM affiliate): Same-sex marriage is as much of a wedge as interracial marriage bans » NOM finally admitting that marriage amendments are, in fact, bans » Kentucky's big anti-LGBT org hopes to pray away a fair court ruling on civil marriage » Iowa's governor sponsoring anti-gay Family Leader summit? » Head of Virginia's top anti-gay org: One mean email proves 'the left' is sexist, intolerant » Video: Ohio should be so lucky to have married couples as adorable as George Henry  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/09/2012

When did 'faith-driven' become stand-in for 'anti-LGBT'?

by Jeremy Hooper

An organization called Faith Driven Consumer has created a back-to-school shopping guide which is getting attention with anti-equality groups like the Christian Civic League of Maine. But what does "faith-driven" mean to this organization and its allies? Well, it all hinges on LGBT acceptance, mainly.

Virtually every single retailer listed by the organization prominently mentions the company's support…

Screen Shot 2012-08-09 At 9.51.57 Am
[SOURCE]

…or lack thereof for LGBT rights:

Screen Shot 2012-08-09 At 9.51.44 Am
[SOURCE]

And even with the few retailers where the evaluation does not mention LGBT rights, the profile mentions code words like "traditional family" and/or "values." That is the be all, end all for the faith-driven consumer: the level with which the listed company backs or shuns its LGBT customer base.

When did this happen? I ask this seriously. At what point did faith-driven belief start pushing things like charitable giving, good will, philanthropy, and community building to the sidelines so that the religious right's bizarre obsession with something Jesus never even mentioned could take prominence?

These "faith-driven" outlets might think they are sawing this company or that. My take? It's the evangelical Christianity brand that they are deeply damaging. Flailing church attendance bears out my belief, not theirs.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails