RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel » A hill of beans: 'Ex-gay'-defending legal firm selling coffee to fund discriminatory endeavors » Anti-gay talker Steve Deace lets LGBT movement know: we're about to sue churches, apparently » Audio: Bored on an apparently too factual weekday, Richard Land pushes 'gays are sexually abused' lie » It seems when you equate gay folk with those who sleep with animals, it sticks; funny how that works  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/09/2012

When did 'faith-driven' become stand-in for 'anti-LGBT'?

by Jeremy Hooper

An organization called Faith Driven Consumer has created a back-to-school shopping guide which is getting attention with anti-equality groups like the Christian Civic League of Maine. But what does "faith-driven" mean to this organization and its allies? Well, it all hinges on LGBT acceptance, mainly.

Virtually every single retailer listed by the organization prominently mentions the company's support…

Screen Shot 2012-08-09 At 9.51.57 Am
[SOURCE]

…or lack thereof for LGBT rights:

Screen Shot 2012-08-09 At 9.51.44 Am
[SOURCE]

And even with the few retailers where the evaluation does not mention LGBT rights, the profile mentions code words like "traditional family" and/or "values." That is the be all, end all for the faith-driven consumer: the level with which the listed company backs or shuns its LGBT customer base.

When did this happen? I ask this seriously. At what point did faith-driven belief start pushing things like charitable giving, good will, philanthropy, and community building to the sidelines so that the religious right's bizarre obsession with something Jesus never even mentioned could take prominence?

These "faith-driven" outlets might think they are sawing this company or that. My take? It's the evangelical Christianity brand that they are deeply damaging. Flailing church attendance bears out my belief, not theirs.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails