RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/02/2012

Wow, an AFA writer actually corrects Thomas Peters' 'Democrat Party' mislabeling

by Jeremy Hooper

This snip (and editorial [sic]) comes from the American Family Association's One New Now site, with the National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters being the quote provider:

Screen Shot 2012-08-02 At 8.43.36 Am
[SOURCE]

"Culture war" watchers know that the far-right loves to carelessly (some would say childishly) misuse the "Democrat Party" phrasing rather than the accurate "Democratic Party" label. I've never seen a fellow far-right outlet correct the misuse. That's actually progress!

Then again, it is the AFA. Perhaps the [sic] is not because Thomas left off the "ic," but rather because he didn't use a more derisive label.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails