RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/02/2012

Wow, an AFA writer actually corrects Thomas Peters' 'Democrat Party' mislabeling

by Jeremy Hooper

This snip (and editorial [sic]) comes from the American Family Association's One New Now site, with the National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters being the quote provider:

Screen Shot 2012-08-02 At 8.43.36 Am
[SOURCE]

"Culture war" watchers know that the far-right loves to carelessly (some would say childishly) misuse the "Democrat Party" phrasing rather than the accurate "Democratic Party" label. I've never seen a fellow far-right outlet correct the misuse. That's actually progress!

Then again, it is the AFA. Perhaps the [sic] is not because Thomas left off the "ic," but rather because he didn't use a more derisive label.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails