RECENT  POSTS:  » Court upholds Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance » Maggie Gallagher won't toast you while you trap your spouse in sin » NOM pre-spins its likely low #March4Marriage attendance » 'Children of gays' lawyer to SCOTUS: Ban same-sex marriage so bisexuals will marry heterosexually » Audio: Ryan T. Anderson says sexual orientation speaks to content of character; links it to sadomasochism, polyamory » WHOA: FRC 'reediting' all those heinous fasting-for-marriage prayers I've been showing you!! » Man who dedicates his life to fighting marriage equality, gay parenting: 'I don't work to harm others' » FRC's eighth day of fasting-for-discrimination: Uses passage about forced drowning to condemn gay parents » NOM: Marriage is some creepy number that looks like it's about to behead one spouse » Desperate anti-gay movement's latest attempt to dehumanize: Gay unions harm straight kids  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/02/2012

Wow, an AFA writer actually corrects Thomas Peters' 'Democrat Party' mislabeling

by Jeremy Hooper

This snip (and editorial [sic]) comes from the American Family Association's One New Now site, with the National Organization For Marriage's Thomas Peters being the quote provider:

Screen Shot 2012-08-02 At 8.43.36 Am
[SOURCE]

"Culture war" watchers know that the far-right loves to carelessly (some would say childishly) misuse the "Democrat Party" phrasing rather than the accurate "Democratic Party" label. I've never seen a fellow far-right outlet correct the misuse. That's actually progress!

Then again, it is the AFA. Perhaps the [sic] is not because Thomas left off the "ic," but rather because he didn't use a more derisive label.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails