RECENT  POSTS:  » Maggie Gallagher forfeits right to ever again talk about gay-related 'slippery slopes' » Extremely anti-gay FRC to lecture folks how to 'rightly' respond to 'wrong' SCOTUS decision » This is such a corrosive idea to put out into the world » Audio: Will you please stop 'attacking' NOM president for saying your sexual orientation, family are 'disordered'? » Video: Mike Huckabee, Republican candidate for increased book sells, vows to defy pro-equality SCOTUS ruling » Reliably tacky NOM turns Memorial Day into day of anti-gay politicking » Ireland: Not only a practical win, but also another tremendous psychological shift » Hillary Clinton campaign honors Harvey Milk, LGBTQ rights » You don't have to pounce on every less-than-pro-gay retailer, anti-gay conservatives! » Video: Tony Perkins tells pastors they 'may have five years' before being 'dragged kicking and screaming from your church'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2012

I want to marry 'ITS & ITS'—is that really something *our* vandals would say?

by Jeremy Hooper

Minnesota For Marriage's Deputy Campaign manager tweeted the following, which is supposedly a "vandalized" sign from a local Lutheran church:

Screen Shot 2012-09-25 At 10.39.44 Am

Now, I'm not going to say with certainty that this is a fake, because anything is possible. Campaign signs do legitimately get damaged, messed with, yanked, knocked over, etc. This is a sweeping, non-partisan reality in American politics. It happens (even if it's often overstated).

But that being said, this supposed example is really weird. I mean, just look at what's written on the sign. This is not the kind of thing our supporters say to help our cause—it's the kind of thing that the anti-equality side puts in our minds and mouths in order to scare folks with their "slippery slope" arguments. I don't know one actual LGBT activist or pro-equality voice who would see this as a helpful thing to say.

And not even just a non-helpful thing to say. Even if this were the act of a snarky person trying to be either funny or pointedly defiant, the message isn't really either. Again, these are the claims that *they* make against us, not the claims we say about our desires for civil marriage equality. We roll our eyes at these kinds of claims. Why would one of our supporters take the time for such a pointless bit of silliness?

Again, I want to reinforce that I'm not saying that Parrish is lying and that this is definitely a fake. But I am saying that anti-equality chicanery is certainly possible, even if Parrish himself doesn't know it. Because that is another unfortunate-yet-undeniable element of American politics in the 21st century: deliberate deception.

Pagebreak-163

*Want to support this site and its mission? Purchase or download Jeremy's book here. And don't worry—the text is suitable for both ITs and ITs.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails