RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2012

I want to marry 'ITS & ITS'—is that really something *our* vandals would say?

by Jeremy Hooper

Minnesota For Marriage's Deputy Campaign manager tweeted the following, which is supposedly a "vandalized" sign from a local Lutheran church:

Screen Shot 2012-09-25 At 10.39.44 Am

Now, I'm not going to say with certainty that this is a fake, because anything is possible. Campaign signs do legitimately get damaged, messed with, yanked, knocked over, etc. This is a sweeping, non-partisan reality in American politics. It happens (even if it's often overstated).

But that being said, this supposed example is really weird. I mean, just look at what's written on the sign. This is not the kind of thing our supporters say to help our cause—it's the kind of thing that the anti-equality side puts in our minds and mouths in order to scare folks with their "slippery slope" arguments. I don't know one actual LGBT activist or pro-equality voice who would see this as a helpful thing to say.

And not even just a non-helpful thing to say. Even if this were the act of a snarky person trying to be either funny or pointedly defiant, the message isn't really either. Again, these are the claims that *they* make against us, not the claims we say about our desires for civil marriage equality. We roll our eyes at these kinds of claims. Why would one of our supporters take the time for such a pointless bit of silliness?

Again, I want to reinforce that I'm not saying that Parrish is lying and that this is definitely a fake. But I am saying that anti-equality chicanery is certainly possible, even if Parrish himself doesn't know it. Because that is another unfortunate-yet-undeniable element of American politics in the 21st century: deliberate deception.

Pagebreak-163

*Want to support this site and its mission? Purchase or download Jeremy's book here. And don't worry—the text is suitable for both ITs and ITs.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails