RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf' » Stop me if you've heard this one: Gay men throw reception for Ted Cruz; Cruz doesn't act as super anti-gay as usual » When will NOM stop denigrating single parents and their children?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2012

I want to marry 'ITS & ITS'—is that really something *our* vandals would say?

by Jeremy Hooper

Minnesota For Marriage's Deputy Campaign manager tweeted the following, which is supposedly a "vandalized" sign from a local Lutheran church:

Screen Shot 2012-09-25 At 10.39.44 Am

Now, I'm not going to say with certainty that this is a fake, because anything is possible. Campaign signs do legitimately get damaged, messed with, yanked, knocked over, etc. This is a sweeping, non-partisan reality in American politics. It happens (even if it's often overstated).

But that being said, this supposed example is really weird. I mean, just look at what's written on the sign. This is not the kind of thing our supporters say to help our cause—it's the kind of thing that the anti-equality side puts in our minds and mouths in order to scare folks with their "slippery slope" arguments. I don't know one actual LGBT activist or pro-equality voice who would see this as a helpful thing to say.

And not even just a non-helpful thing to say. Even if this were the act of a snarky person trying to be either funny or pointedly defiant, the message isn't really either. Again, these are the claims that *they* make against us, not the claims we say about our desires for civil marriage equality. We roll our eyes at these kinds of claims. Why would one of our supporters take the time for such a pointless bit of silliness?

Again, I want to reinforce that I'm not saying that Parrish is lying and that this is definitely a fake. But I am saying that anti-equality chicanery is certainly possible, even if Parrish himself doesn't know it. Because that is another unfortunate-yet-undeniable element of American politics in the 21st century: deliberate deception.

Pagebreak-163

*Want to support this site and its mission? Purchase or download Jeremy's book here. And don't worry—the text is suitable for both ITs and ITs.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails