RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/21/2012

Protect Marriage Maine plays chicken with logic

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out this highlighted talking point from Protect Marriage Maine's campaign materials:

Screen Shot 2012-09-21 At 12.02.56 Pm
[PDF]

Right. So a a few things.

(1) Dan Cathy (who is actually the COO, not CEO) did not "speak out in favor of traditional marriage." In reality, he said people like me are of a "deprived mind" and capable of "inviting God's judgment on our nation" by virtue of our love. That's much different.

But (2), regardless of what you think of his thoughts or of "traditional marriage," the reaction to it did not hinge on marriage equality AT ALL. Look even at the cities that PMM used as examples. Chicago? San Francisco? Neither of those cities has civil marriage equality for same-gender couples. People across this nation reacted to Dan Cathy's words and actions because of their support for LGBT people, not any one specific issue.


It's truly absurd that the opposition is now seriously using this twisted fast food matter in its marriage talking points. However, if they are going to do so, then they need to be honest about what really went down and be honest about what effect marriage will or will not have on the facts at hand.

Then again, this is the campaign that believes its personally-held faith beliefs in regard to religious marital ceremony should guide our shared law in regard to civil marriage licensing. Perhaps I should be thankful that they're even allowing a gay like me to read their morally-superior materials.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails