'Proctect' Marriage Maine

RECENT	POSTS:	» Report: IL has votes to free itself from marital discrimination's slipping grips » David Barton: AIDS, meningitis are gay people's 'due penalties' » Are gay boys not boys? A look at the cruelty the equal Scouting opponents engender » Audio: The time VA Lt. Gov candidate E.W. Jackson directly connected gays to pedophiles » MassResistance: NOM a 'no-show' in Illinois » FRC quite literally pitting God against little boys who happen to be gay, good at knot-tying » Anti–equal Scouting coalition: All signs point toward fairness, but trust us—discrimination is right » And now in news for the naive: As long as gay scouts are banned, boys won't discuss sex » Supposedly marriage-focused NOM promotes Boy Scouts discrimination » Married gay celeb challenges misconceptions, elementary-level spelling errors

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/15/2012

by Jeremy Hooper

I've always wondered what groups like "Protect Marriage Maine" are really trying to do, since protection itself seems like a really silly goal. But now It finally makes sense. Turns out they're not trying to protect at all—they are actually hoping to "proctect":

(*appears at top of all PMM webpages)

Now, I can't find an actual definition of "proctect," so I'm just going to assume it's some little known verb that means "to make more discriminatory." Right? Because let's face it, making marriage an alienating rather than unifying institution is precisely what the peace-hostile PMM is trying to do. So clearly the word "proctect" is some sort of secret code word that is little known outside of anti-equality circles. It's gotta be. I'm sure of it!

Thanks for slipping up and unwittingly giving us this insight, PMM. Now every time you say "Protect," I'm gonna be like, "Ohhhhhhhh…yeahhhhhhh…protect….surrrrrrre…uhhuh…[::wink, wink::]." Will do that more than I already did, I mean.

space