RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/10/2012

'When blue and red come together, they go purple' #spiritday

by Jeremy Hooper

In the run-up to October 19's Spirit Day, GLAAD has a smart ask for the President and his GOP challenger:

Screen Shot 2012-10-10 At 2.37.33 Pm
http://www.glaad.org/spiritday/purple2012

This is one of those things that could seem silly to you on the surface. It's just purple clothing, you might think. It's the least they could do, you might say in frustration.

But in truth, this is a great conversation starter. As you surely know, a growing number of prominent people choose to participate in Spirit Day with every passing year. All over the airwaves, the media is filled with purple—LGBT allies showing their support for basic respect and, ideally, acceptance. GLAAD has put a lot of muscle into this campaign and the results are apparent. Seriously, turn on your TV on Oct. 19—you'll likely think Barney the dinosaur has adopted a new career as a costume designer.

So if one of the two candidates chooses to not participate (I'll let you guess which one), it'll be a good chance for folks from both political parties to ask why. Regardless of where you might stand on certain policy matters, both parties can hopefully agree that LGBT people should be protected from harms and brought into a world of peace. So what will it say if one (or both) of the candidates turns a blind eye to this, a day that is now virtually impossible to miss? There's absolutely no way the campaigns will be unaware of the event, so the sartorial choices on that day will certainly be campaign discussions. What will they choose? And why?

If it's cold, one might choose purple mitts. But won't it seem cold if one doesn't choose purple? Mitt?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails