RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/10/2012

'When blue and red come together, they go purple' #spiritday

by Jeremy Hooper

In the run-up to October 19's Spirit Day, GLAAD has a smart ask for the President and his GOP challenger:

Screen Shot 2012-10-10 At 2.37.33 Pm
http://www.glaad.org/spiritday/purple2012

This is one of those things that could seem silly to you on the surface. It's just purple clothing, you might think. It's the least they could do, you might say in frustration.

But in truth, this is a great conversation starter. As you surely know, a growing number of prominent people choose to participate in Spirit Day with every passing year. All over the airwaves, the media is filled with purple—LGBT allies showing their support for basic respect and, ideally, acceptance. GLAAD has put a lot of muscle into this campaign and the results are apparent. Seriously, turn on your TV on Oct. 19—you'll likely think Barney the dinosaur has adopted a new career as a costume designer.

So if one of the two candidates chooses to not participate (I'll let you guess which one), it'll be a good chance for folks from both political parties to ask why. Regardless of where you might stand on certain policy matters, both parties can hopefully agree that LGBT people should be protected from harms and brought into a world of peace. So what will it say if one (or both) of the candidates turns a blind eye to this, a day that is now virtually impossible to miss? There's absolutely no way the campaigns will be unaware of the event, so the sartorial choices on that day will certainly be campaign discussions. What will they choose? And why?

If it's cold, one might choose purple mitts. But won't it seem cold if one doesn't choose purple? Mitt?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails