RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/26/2012

And now this from the man single-handedly destroying AFA's last shreds of credibility:

by Jeremy Hooper

What he's referring to in these tweets is the condom mandate, which requires Los Angeles adult performers to wrap it up before shooting sex scenes. In the world of the American Family Association's ever-relentless Bryan Fischer, that requirement for both gay and straight performers, is somehow equivalent to the incarceration/death penalties that some Uganda lawmakers want to impose on LGB citizens:

Screen Shot 2012-11-26 At 8.20.46 Am
Screen Shot 2012-11-26 At 8.24.24 Am

Where to even begin? Do you start with the obvious difference between sex work and sexual orientation? Do you start with the stark contrast between safer sex practices and draconian laws that can even come with the death penalty in some cases? Do you note, again, that the Los Angeles policy is the same for all performers regardless of sexual orientation (despite Bryan's insistence that it's just about gay sex)? Or do you just let it all hang there, as the readers' own interoperation of Bryan's obvious agenda, motivations, and seeming support for the proposed Uganda laws is likely more damaging to the AFA's reputation than anything I could even say?

I'm going with the latter. Here we have a man giving credence to a proposed national policy that is so chillingly heinous, even hardcore social conservatives have been clear to distance themselves from it (even if, in some cases, it was only after the were called out). If Bryan wants to advocate for the kinds of restrictions being discussed in Uganda, it's only going to help us American activists connect crucial dots about our own organizations here at home.

Pagebreak-203

**Oh, and there's this one, too:

Fischeruganda
(via Joe)

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails