RECENT  POSTS:  » 2006: When Clinton vocally supported her state moving forward w/ marriage equality but Sanders did not » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight  
GAY-Good-As-You

INFO:

Good-As-You-whats-this Good-As-You-DISCLAIMER Good-As-You-PRIVACY Good-As-You-FAQ

CONTACT:

Good-As-You-AIM Good-As-You-email Good-As-You-facebook Good-As-You-twitter

Site Resources:

Good-As-You-LINKS Good-As-You-LINKS Good-As-You-States Good-As-You-By-State

Fun Stuff:

Andrew-Jeremy G-A-Y-PRIDE sanctity-of-marriage

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/04/2012

Chuck Woolery not into Maddow because he's 'not into young boys'

 by Jeremy Hooper

Charming homophobia/sexism/generalized yuck from a vocal Mitt Romney backer:

Screen Shot 2012-11-04 At 11.55.11 Am

Not into proper apostrophization either, I see.

No word if Maddow is a bigger fan of Woolery's hosting acumen than he is of hers. If I find a time machine, I'll ask her.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

 
Related Posts with Thumbnails