RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/02/2012

Here's what the anti-gay movement's race games look like

by Jeremy Hooper

The Family Research Council has issued the following bulletin insert in every state where we're on the ballot. Here's the Washington version, which looks like every other version I've seen:

201211020844
[FRC]

But now get this. FRC just posted its Maryland version of this same document, which will presumably be dropped into churches this weekend. Notice the one substantial change:

201211020845
[FRC]

No textual changes other than to make it specific to the state. No content alterations to speak of. Only real difference? In Maryland, the picture is changed to an African American couple. FRC staffers made a deliberate change here so that they, like their buddies at NOM, could specifically target the Black church.

Keep "driving that wedge," kiddies. It's quite becoming of your movement. Really. I mean it.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails