RECENT  POSTS:  » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/14/2012

'Marriage still wins when equally funded'

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2012-11-14 At 9.36.07 AmSince election day, the social conservatives who saw their desire to discriminate within the confines of marriage receive a major drubbing at four state's polls and in the embodiment of our equality-supporting President have been working the idea that this latest round was somehow unfair because their side took in less cash than the opposition. They say it as if those of us who support marriage equality got some sort of unfair handicap, cheat code, or gypsy bottle that blessed us with a pot of gold. They make it sound like the potentiality was unbalanced, with our side having some sort of bias working in our favor.

What they fail to realize (or at least admit) is that the funding component is itself a statement on where we are as a nation. The truth is that those of us on the side of equality have a larger donor base because equality is an exciting prospect that people are itching to support. We have more corporate backing because companies are increasingly realizing that peaceful nondiscrimination is better for business than is inequality. We are more in line with celebrity consensus because folks in the arts tend to actually know (and enjoy) LGBT people. Even with the other side's built-in network of churches and parachurch organizations, we are still out raising them because our side is the one of the uptick. Their fight comes with diminishing returns.

Would they do better if they were still able to out raise us? Perhaps, since money is still a powerful campaign tool. However, the reality in regard to bankrolling speaks to greater truths about this debate itself. Citizens—from lay to famous, poor to rich, freelance to CEO—are voting with their dollars. Peaceful civil equality is a winning bet.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails