RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/02/2012

More obvious politicking from NOM's not-allowed-to-electioneer nonprofit

by Jeremy Hooper

As a c3, the Ruth Institute (a project of the National Organization For Marriage's Education Fund) is not allowed to campaign for candidates. So clearly Finance Director Jennifer Thieme intends for this intro to the org's latest fundraising blast to serve as nothing more than a social commentary on how to properly insulate storm drains, not any sort of witness-leading in regard to the presidential candidates. Right?

Screen Shot 2012-11-02 At 9.05.02 Am

Defending poor Mitt Romney—a pauper, don't cha know?—from the mean President's money. Pushing right up to that line again, huh Ruth?

Pagebreak-191

*In this same fundraising blast, Thieme also admits that Ruth (aka NOM) doesn't want kids believing the "lie" that homosexual is okay:

Screen Shot 2012-11-02 At 9.14.01 Am

Eh, at least they're getting more honest.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails