RECENT  POSTS:  » I can't keep pretending to care about [insert activist] saying [insert ridiculous thing] » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/06/2012

Today in hollow self-satisfaction: Maryland Marriage Alliance 'proves' neighborly love by cruelly denying civil rights

by Jeremy Hooper

Of all the justifications I've seen over the past few months, the highlight portion of this GOTV message might take the irrational cake:

Screen Shot 2012-11-06 At 11.23.22 Am

Um, how is this proof exactly? "See dear neighbor, I love you so much that I just invalidated your plan 2013 wedding. Aren't I sweet?"

Yeah—but no. A vote against Question 6 is proof of nothing more than one's choice to put personal, usually religiously-motivated view above a legislatively-tested, gubernatorially-enacted law that respects the civil rights of all Marylanders. Telling themselves that their vote is an act of love may help the Maryland Marriage Alliance members' ability to sleep at night. But truth is not like one of their press releases, able to be shaped by myopic societal reads, deceptive code words and hackneyed phrases. Reality demands a higher standard.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails