RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/19/2012

When Illinois starts debating marriage and state's major 'pro-family' group gets involve...

by Jeremy Hooper

…let us all remember that this organization, the Illinois Family Institute, believes two key things that many who are involved in the fight will try to deny. The IFI's chief thinker, Laurie Higgins, lays it out in a new pamphlet called "Marriage is Not A Civil Right."

#1: The IFI does not stop at just marriage. Left to its own unchecked agenda, this organization would also go after adoption rights:

Screen Shot 2012-11-19 At 2.41.33 Pm
[FULL PDF]

This one will be fun to bring up when they start running their "it's just about the word and meaning of marriage" ads.

#2: The IFI does not even pretend to honor any semblance of separation between civil license and optional religious ceremony. Laurie puts it this way:

Screen Shot 2012-11-19 At 2.42.03 Pm
[FULL PDF]

This one will be fun to bring up when they deny religious animus. Because let's get real—that's what this is. We do, in fact, live in a world where (a) the civil marriage license is required of any couple who wants state/federal recognition, with the religious component always optional; and (b) millions of same-sex couples are now legally able to marry, with more to come in the next few years. Using your faith to deny this factual legal landscape is just bullying behavior.


There's no doubt that when this state does start its inevitable debate over whether it will bump up currently-legal civil unions system to full marriage status, groups like the National Organization For Marriage will once again push out voices like Lauries and once again pretend there whole fight is grounded in law and hyperfocused on this one specific area. To paraphrase Laurie Higgins: It won't be true—never was, is not now, never will be.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails