RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/19/2012

When Illinois starts debating marriage and state's major 'pro-family' group gets involve...

by Jeremy Hooper

…let us all remember that this organization, the Illinois Family Institute, believes two key things that many who are involved in the fight will try to deny. The IFI's chief thinker, Laurie Higgins, lays it out in a new pamphlet called "Marriage is Not A Civil Right."

#1: The IFI does not stop at just marriage. Left to its own unchecked agenda, this organization would also go after adoption rights:

Screen Shot 2012-11-19 At 2.41.33 Pm
[FULL PDF]

This one will be fun to bring up when they start running their "it's just about the word and meaning of marriage" ads.

#2: The IFI does not even pretend to honor any semblance of separation between civil license and optional religious ceremony. Laurie puts it this way:

Screen Shot 2012-11-19 At 2.42.03 Pm
[FULL PDF]

This one will be fun to bring up when they deny religious animus. Because let's get real—that's what this is. We do, in fact, live in a world where (a) the civil marriage license is required of any couple who wants state/federal recognition, with the religious component always optional; and (b) millions of same-sex couples are now legally able to marry, with more to come in the next few years. Using your faith to deny this factual legal landscape is just bullying behavior.


There's no doubt that when this state does start its inevitable debate over whether it will bump up currently-legal civil unions system to full marriage status, groups like the National Organization For Marriage will once again push out voices like Lauries and once again pretend there whole fight is grounded in law and hyperfocused on this one specific area. To paraphrase Laurie Higgins: It won't be true—never was, is not now, never will be.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails