RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/18/2012

UPDATE: USNews.com readers reject Brian Brown's flawed arguments

by Jeremy Hooper

When I posted about it yesterday, the National Organization For Marriage was rounding out the bottom with a negative sixteen score. Now (as of 8:50AM):

Screen Shot 2012-12-18 At 8.47.35 Am
SOURCE: USNews.com

What's even more remarkable about this is the fact that NOM has itself promoted Brian's commentary. So this is the laughably horrible score Brian got *with* NOM's own support base factored in. Surely would have been worse without it.

It's a lot harder to shape a false impression when ratings are left unmoderated.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails