RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


A new video, NOM? Yeah? That's what you're going with?

by Jeremy Hooper

That old fibbing factory about all things great and small, the National Organization For Marriage, is pushing a "new Marriage Anti-Defamation" Alliance video starring a Canadian father who wants the "right" to be forewarned and to remove his children from the public school day whenever certain subjects are taught. NOM Framed it as new:

Screen Shot 2013-01-30 At 4.16.32 Pm

Only thing? This video isn't new. The portions NOM chose to use might be different, but this is the very same interview that the failed Minnesota For Marriage campaign tried to use against us (as an exclusive!) way back in October. Same outfit, same setting, same bullet points:

Screen Shot 2013-01-30 At 4.43.04 Pm
[MN For Marriage]

NOM has simply slapped its branding on this thing, as if it's some new creation that's going to have better success for them than it did for MN For Marriage, only the second team to ever lose a marriage amendment fight. There's no "new" here.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails