RECENT  POSTS:  » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings » TV's Duggar family continues anti-LGBT activism » Caught ya: Far-right's latest marriage 'victim' edited website to make more solid legal case » Read: Wyoming to become our 32nd marriage equality state » GLAAD: Victory is what happens while you're busy making other plans  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/30/2013

A new video, NOM? Yeah? That's what you're going with?

by Jeremy Hooper

That old fibbing factory about all things great and small, the National Organization For Marriage, is pushing a "new Marriage Anti-Defamation" Alliance video starring a Canadian father who wants the "right" to be forewarned and to remove his children from the public school day whenever certain subjects are taught. NOM Framed it as new:

Screen Shot 2013-01-30 At 4.16.32 Pm
[NOM]

Only thing? This video isn't new. The portions NOM chose to use might be different, but this is the very same interview that the failed Minnesota For Marriage campaign tried to use against us (as an exclusive!) way back in October. Same outfit, same setting, same bullet points:

Screen Shot 2013-01-30 At 4.43.04 Pm
[MN For Marriage]

NOM has simply slapped its branding on this thing, as if it's some new creation that's going to have better success for them than it did for MN For Marriage, only the second team to ever lose a marriage amendment fight. There's no "new" here.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails