RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/22/2013

Peter Sprigg gets on CNN again; plays the victim—again #glaadcap

by Jeremy Hooper

Peter Sprigg, a man who has said that there is "a place for criminal sanctions" against homosexuality and said that he'd "prefer to export homosexuals from the United States than import them into the United States" (both of those here) was on CNN again this morning. Because why not? They'd uncritically book a man who said the same about any other minority population, right?

Anyway, Peter apparently said this about President Obama's inclusive inaugural mentions:

Screen Shot 2013-01-22 At 8.50.02 Am

"Laying down the gauntlet"? Um, not for nothing P.S, but isn't your employer, the Family Research Council, the one fighting daily against every single last gain for LGBT people? And aren't you the one who, just yesterday, retweeted the beyond hostile Bryan Fischer with an added claim that gay people are not created? Some might say that those actions are the ones that are "laying down a gauntlet," not the push by a human population to live lives free of fear.

And as for "working together"? Well honestly, Peter—we have no plans to "work with" you on the matter of lGBT rights. This is not a two-sided debate with equally merited contenders. The Family Research Council has made it perfectly that its vision leaves LGBT unprotected, unmarried, aggressively unchurched, excluded from any and every institution, and, ultimately, "changed" into something called an "ex-gay." We are not entertaining any of that as it's a really a thing. We proudly reject the FRC's highly discriminatory agenda. America voted in a President who sides with us, not the Family Research Council. Better luck in '16, buddy.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails