RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Fake news calls out fake victims » AG Holder: Whichever way SCOTUS goes, work continues » Video: Powerful 'Families Are Forever' trailer (watch and share!) » Republican does what all GOP candidates will eventually do (i.e. accept gays); feels MassResistance's wrath (i.e. tsk-tsking blog post) » NOM versus Jennifer Aniston's three-year-old opinion » 'Discriminating with the Stars': Reality TV personality to head FRC's Action arm » FRC back to scanning Google Images for drag queens; ENDA must be back in news » NOM EXPOSED: NOM & Co. trying to create an iconic image to rival HRC's » 'Gays against gay marriage' = the new 'ex-gay' » Of course Bryan Fischer's bizarre obsession with homosexuality is *our* fault (#AlwaysTheVictim)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/02/2013

Protecting marriage in Illinois, 1937 style

by Jeremy Hooper

The bill was actually proposed by an Indiana legislator, but his stated intent was to "protect Illinois." And while that phrase is now shouted around by folks wanting to stop gays from marrying in the state, the scourge at the time involved heterosexuals crossing state lines in order to get around the medical exams and three day waiting requirements that were required of couples at the time:

201301021245

Somehow, the "protect Illinois" crowd coped with couples' freedom to marry, in-state or out. And they will again.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails