RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/28/2013

Read: FRC files brief in Windsor (DOMA) case

by Jeremy Hooper

FRC with an assist from the uber-far-right Thomas More Society:

FRC's amicus brief in the 'Windsor' case by

What's most striking about this largely inconsequential brief is just how legalese-laden it is. Those of us who know the Family Research Council know the group and its leaders as the "ex-gay"-supporting, overheated rhetoric–spouting, gay-condemning organization that has met the Southern Poverty Law Center's high bar for earning "hate group" status. But the FRC knows that this sort of behavior (i.e. the usual) would hurt their side in court, so the roll back the typical in favor and ratchet up the pragmatism instead. It's as if they are two different groups:the one who raises funds firing up a fervent base and the one that still wants to play with the adults when court/cable news/political convention time rolls around.

A true "friend of the court" would file a response brief presenting the FRC's own verbatim words to the nine justices. If FRC, one of the key organizations behind DOMA's very existence, wants to talk about what really motivates this worthless law, let's also talk about the regular stream of evidence that fills the typical FRC workaday. It should be part of the dialogue.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails