RECENT  POSTS:  » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years » Video: Mississippian who made soldier his lifestyle choice seeks freedom based on unchosen orientation » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/28/2013

Read: FRC files brief in Windsor (DOMA) case

by Jeremy Hooper

FRC with an assist from the uber-far-right Thomas More Society:

FRC's amicus brief in the 'Windsor' case by

What's most striking about this largely inconsequential brief is just how legalese-laden it is. Those of us who know the Family Research Council know the group and its leaders as the "ex-gay"-supporting, overheated rhetoric–spouting, gay-condemning organization that has met the Southern Poverty Law Center's high bar for earning "hate group" status. But the FRC knows that this sort of behavior (i.e. the usual) would hurt their side in court, so the roll back the typical in favor and ratchet up the pragmatism instead. It's as if they are two different groups:the one who raises funds firing up a fervent base and the one that still wants to play with the adults when court/cable news/political convention time rolls around.

A true "friend of the court" would file a response brief presenting the FRC's own verbatim words to the nine justices. If FRC, one of the key organizations behind DOMA's very existence, wants to talk about what really motivates this worthless law, let's also talk about the regular stream of evidence that fills the typical FRC workaday. It should be part of the dialogue.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails