RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/04/2013

Read: Hubristic Thomas More Society claims discrimination is victimized position

by Jeremy Hooper

Illinois' same-sex couples cannot have their deserved civil freedoms because doing so might make those who oppose feel like bigots. So says the (Catholic) Thomas More Society, echoing the familiar refrain with which the anti-equality side keeps trying to dupe the public:

Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act Letter

Those of us who cover this stuff are quite familiar with the self-victimizing game. But when you step back and think about it, it's truly outrageous how easily these "values" groups peddle this strategy. It is literally like the public school lunch room bully saying he wants to take away another kid's lunch money because that other kid's ability to eat peacefully might threaten the bully's own government-granted satiation. This, even though the bully has his own lunch, which the other kid is not at all trying to take away from him. The bully just wants his cake *and* the other kid's cake too.

And I say this as someone who doesn't think all people who oppose marriage equality are "bullies." Not even close. I'd much prefer to focus on the merits of civil marriage rather than the arrogance of the arguments opposing it. It's the organized "protect marriage" movement and their crude attempts to flip the script (in order to absolve their concerted conscience) that have forced my hand.

***

**CORRECTION: An earlier edition of this post referred to the Thomas More Society as the Thomas More Law Center, a separate conservative legal outfit based out of Ann Arbor, MI. Sorry for the confusion.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails