RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/14/2013

Right Said Fred versus Wrong-Sayer Scott

by Jeremy Hooper

Richard Fairbrass has told the world that he is too sexy for his shirt. Scott Lively has told the world that gays are too nasty for, well, just about anything. This week, they will apparently both do a little turn on the cat walk, debating each other at the prestigious Oxford Union:

201301141450
[Oxford Union]
(via Melanie Nathan)

But first, a performance of the seven-hour-long (if performed in full) Angels In America? Is it just me, or is this the weirdest night of LGBT-ness imaginable?!

Oh, and also—Scott "gays are like intravenous drug users" Lively?! Really, Oxford? Really?! The whole crimes against a humanity trial is now a selling point?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails