RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/11/2013

'Activists who care more about conformity than character'

by Jeremy Hooper

The outrageous comments are much easier to pinpoint. But to me, the subtle denigrations that the far-right social conservative groups and speakers use to win support and/or votes are often more offensive than the directly stated condemnations.

Take this little commentary from Family Research Council president Tony Perkins (highlighting is my own):

Screen Shot 2013-02-11 At 9.03.00 Am
[FRC]

Okay. So clearly, the "activists" are those of us who are pushing for inclusive scouting. All of us: men and women, moms and dads, young and old, Republican and Democrat. We, the coalition pushing for basic fairness are the "activists" in Tony Perkins' scheme. It doesn't take much with this guy.

And where does Tony place our supposedly monolithic priorities? On conformity, in this case. And that conformity, Tony asserts, comes at the expense of character. That is his final, definitive line. To keep support alive over the next few months before the Boy Scouts take up this matter of inclusive scouting, Tony hopes to position this whole thing as just a fad. As a trend. As an "activist" plan that, ultimately, destroys character. Because why not?

It's a subtle slight, but it's a truly sick one. Tony is saying that a mom like Jen Tyrrell, someone who simply wants to serve her son's life the way a million other den mothers so, is in this conversation because she's just some activist-driven lemming. Tony is saying that President Obama's voice of support on this matter comes at the expense of national character. Tony is implying that any one of us among the millions who support inclusive scouting is engaged in some sort of hostile act against morality. And he says it because he wants people to believe it. He, like so many other social conservatives, truly wants to cultivate this kind of worldview—one that accepts, as a given, that pro-equality equals anti-righteousness.

These are those little cuts that slice and dice the LGBT person's psyche on a daily basis. Yes, it's enraging when one of the professionally discriminatory spokesfigures like Tony Perkins comes right out and says one of the exceedingly nasty things he has said about us, our lives, and our loves. But in a weird way, these less overt attacks—and don't be fooled, they are deliberate attacks—are more disturbing, more damaging, and more dangerous. More telling, too.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails