RECENT  POSTS:  » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy' » Legal profession made up of ideologues, demands legal ideologue » FRC's senior fellow for exporting/criminalizing gay people bemoan's discrimination's dwindling acceptance » (ARCHIVED): President signs executive order protecting LGBT workers » That discriminatory Colorado baker won't make Halloween cakes either » Catholic Bishops again go after basic workplace protections for LGBT people » FL anti-gay activist, head of anti-gay Boy Scouts group says marriage inequality is 'issue worth dying for'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/14/2013

Illinois Family Institute's predictably fair, measured, rational reply to Senate passage of marriage bill

by Jeremy Hooper

For the aggressively anti-gay Illinois Family Institute, it's either civil marriage equality or the (stock photo) family:

Screen Shot 2013-02-14 At 4.10.30 Pm
[IFI]

Not even leaving room for a tie? Really? They're just going to go ahead and declare there to be one eventual "winner" and "loser," even though we have on-the-ground evidence in nine other states where both families and states have survived? Seems like a weird bet to make.

Then again, they did leave off the question marks. Perhaps they are really just making some sort of declarative statements about the band The Who. You know stock photo families never care for Baba O'Riley.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails