RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/14/2013

Illinois Family Institute's predictably fair, measured, rational reply to Senate passage of marriage bill

by Jeremy Hooper

For the aggressively anti-gay Illinois Family Institute, it's either civil marriage equality or the (stock photo) family:

Screen Shot 2013-02-14 At 4.10.30 Pm
[IFI]

Not even leaving room for a tie? Really? They're just going to go ahead and declare there to be one eventual "winner" and "loser," even though we have on-the-ground evidence in nine other states where both families and states have survived? Seems like a weird bet to make.

Then again, they did leave off the question marks. Perhaps they are really just making some sort of declarative statements about the band The Who. You know stock photo families never care for Baba O'Riley.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails