RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/14/2013

Illinois Family Institute's predictably fair, measured, rational reply to Senate passage of marriage bill

by Jeremy Hooper

For the aggressively anti-gay Illinois Family Institute, it's either civil marriage equality or the (stock photo) family:

Screen Shot 2013-02-14 At 4.10.30 Pm
[IFI]

Not even leaving room for a tie? Really? They're just going to go ahead and declare there to be one eventual "winner" and "loser," even though we have on-the-ground evidence in nine other states where both families and states have survived? Seems like a weird bet to make.

Then again, they did leave off the question marks. Perhaps they are really just making some sort of declarative statements about the band The Who. You know stock photo families never care for Baba O'Riley.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails