RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay American Family Association claims the discriminatory business owner is our modern-day Hester Prynne » Focus on the Family fundraising at intersection of self-centeredness and anti-gayness » Count the lies in this Values Voter Summit description » Video: If nothing else will get you to 'Ex-gay Awareness Dinner' then this will—not do the trick either » Video: Bill Donohue on early '90s gay 'animals' and their 'Nazi-like invasions' » Video: Two dads + four kids = one representation of Florida's many denied, discriminated against families » Survey: Catholic leadership's never-ending attacks on gay people's peace is regressing church's acceptance levels » GLAAD: Anti-LGBT activist wishes US punished LGBT people by life imprisonment, just like Uganda and Gambia » Head of Chicago Archdiocese equates LGBT accomodation with forced sharia law » NOM to Oregon: We will not let your dead horses rest; please direct us to your whips and paddles  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/22/2013

NOM is now a joke. Seriously, a joke. Like we should all laugh at them. Because they're a joke.

by Jeremy Hooper

In 2012, the National Organization For Marriage launched an ad called "Compromise." The whole thing claimed that civil unions were a "common sense compromise" in New Hampshire. Flashback:

But get this. NOM is now trying to stop civil unions in Colorado. And now? Well, look what the ever-disingenuous NOM has to say about civil unions

Screen Shot 2013-02-22 At 5.23.26 Pm
[SOURCE]

It is jaw-dropping, this hypocrisy. This is not a different NOM than the one that gave its campaign in favor of New Hampshire civil unions the "Compromise" title. Brian Brown is still president. Key advisers and staffers are all still in place. This is the very same NOM that pretended to be okay with "compromise," but they are now admitting that they were fibbing all along (something I knew and called out then).

What's changed? Well, it's obvious: the NOMmers think they have a possibility of beating back civil unions in Colorado, a possibility they did not have in New Hampshire. Because that's how NOM determines its virtue: not by genuine principle but rather by political achievability. That is one of the (multitude of) reasons people find this organization so shockingly cynical and downright dirty. Here we have an organization claiming the "morality" mantle on issues of marriage, family, and religion, yet the people in charge can't even pick a position and stick with it. One year, in one state, they talk about respecting us and wanting us to have this basic level of rights, so long as we don't "attack marriage." But then, twelve months later, they're all like, "Screw your relationship rights; maybe you can build a moat with a dragon to protect your family?"


Although NOM is right on one thing: we can't compromise with the organized forces who discriminate against us. Not anymore and probably not ever again. They have more than proven that they want the inch, the mile, and just about anything else we have, too. They have more than shown that any witness they bear is highly likely to turn out false.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails