RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/21/2013

NOM staffers say this stuff like they really believe it

by Jeremy Hooper

A properly confused visitor to the National Organization For Marriage's so-called "march for marriage" site asked whether that page was for or against same-sex marriage. Check out how NOM organizer Joe Grabowski responded:

Screen Shot 2013-02-21 At 12.19.52 Pm

(1) I'm for man/woman marriage too. I've toasted many couples, danced many dances, and given countless dollars in gifts. When it comes to the union of love, commitment, and open bars, no one is more game than me.

(2) Individuals and faith communities have every right to speak up for marriage. Or against marriage, for that matter. Freedom of speech means we all have the right to engage without government interference. Freedom of religion grants folks the right to pray or not pray however they wish. However, none of us have the right to use our personal theology to limit others' civil rights, and none of us have the right to flout nondiscrimination laws. And that is the issue here: the opposition's desire to overreach in a way that violates others' freedoms.

(3) No, voters do not have the "right" to limit marriage in the way that the missteps of past referenda suggests they do. Civil rights are not a popularity contest. My marriage is not a student council election. Just because these kind of votes have happened does not make them right. Do not confuse this nation's one-was with its will-be. That kind of thinking has a tendency to backfire, especially when speaking of the course of minority rights and protections.

(4) Go like a truly pro-marriage Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/March4Marriage

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails