RECENT  POSTS:  » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays » Video: Reality star Josh Duggar leads sad little inequality rally in Little Rock, AR » READ: Federal judge strikes Montana's discriminatory marriage ban » Major global brand P&G comes out for marriage equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/21/2013

NOM staffers say this stuff like they really believe it

by Jeremy Hooper

A properly confused visitor to the National Organization For Marriage's so-called "march for marriage" site asked whether that page was for or against same-sex marriage. Check out how NOM organizer Joe Grabowski responded:

Screen Shot 2013-02-21 At 12.19.52 Pm

(1) I'm for man/woman marriage too. I've toasted many couples, danced many dances, and given countless dollars in gifts. When it comes to the union of love, commitment, and open bars, no one is more game than me.

(2) Individuals and faith communities have every right to speak up for marriage. Or against marriage, for that matter. Freedom of speech means we all have the right to engage without government interference. Freedom of religion grants folks the right to pray or not pray however they wish. However, none of us have the right to use our personal theology to limit others' civil rights, and none of us have the right to flout nondiscrimination laws. And that is the issue here: the opposition's desire to overreach in a way that violates others' freedoms.

(3) No, voters do not have the "right" to limit marriage in the way that the missteps of past referenda suggests they do. Civil rights are not a popularity contest. My marriage is not a student council election. Just because these kind of votes have happened does not make them right. Do not confuse this nation's one-was with its will-be. That kind of thinking has a tendency to backfire, especially when speaking of the course of minority rights and protections.

(4) Go like a truly pro-marriage Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/March4Marriage

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails