RECENT  POSTS:  » What to even say about Josh Duggar? » GOP prez candidates lining up for NOM-sponsored event in Iowa » Video: Ted Cruz tells viciously anti-gay Family Research Council he's got their back on anti-gay discrimination » Scouts prez seeks long overdue end to offensive stigma » FRC prays against Dan Savage 'spewing upon our nation'; I'll let Dan make that joke himself » Sen. (and prez candidate) Cruz to join extreme anti-LGBT activists at Family Research Council event (#WOTW15) » 'Out' magazine's editor-in-chief makes case against gay 'bullies'; it's shortsighted and here's why » Voodoo, snake oil, 'changing' gays: CA congressman to introduce national ban on dangerous anti-science » Because the internet exists, listen to former 'Love Connection' host Chuck Woolery rant about marriage equality » Today in least-you-can-do-ness: Billy Graham's son tweeting anti-equality prayers to SCOTUS justices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/07/2013

Ever-deceptive FRC twists 50+ yr old hit piece into supposed battle plan

by Jeremy Hooper

The exceedingly anti-gay Family Research Council begins its latest round of "Prayer Targets" with this:

Screen Shot 2013-03-07 At 10.45.55 Am
[FRC Prayer Targets]

Only thing? The Naked Communist was not an actual book written by actual communists—it was a conservative hit piece in which Cleon Skousen, a rabidly conservative anti-Communist (he worked with the John Birch Society), drummed up "Red Scare" era fears with this list of supposed goals. These were not actual goals but rather conservative fears that they wanted to use to scare the public. It is uber-Screen Shot 2013-03-07 At 10.58.22 Amdeceptive to use it now, as if the conservative fear-mongering of 1958 justifies its modern day counterpart. To put it in modern context: This would be like using an FRC pamphlet on the supposed "gay agenda" to describe LGBT people's actual wants and desires.

Oh, and speaking specifically to the gay one: The word FRC cut out and replaced with an ellipsis was "degeneracy." The actual fear line that the far-right Mr. Skousen wrote: "Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." It's obvious why FRC cut that out: because it would have told you, the potential supporter, too much about the agenda that sparked this particular work. Mr. Skousen conflated homosexuality with degeneracy because that's how he saw gays; his document was meant to teach the public to see gays in the same way. Sound familiar?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails