RECENT  POSTS:  » What to even say about Josh Duggar? » GOP prez candidates lining up for NOM-sponsored event in Iowa » Video: Ted Cruz tells viciously anti-gay Family Research Council he's got their back on anti-gay discrimination » Scouts prez seeks long overdue end to offensive stigma » FRC prays against Dan Savage 'spewing upon our nation'; I'll let Dan make that joke himself » Sen. (and prez candidate) Cruz to join extreme anti-LGBT activists at Family Research Council event (#WOTW15) » 'Out' magazine's editor-in-chief makes case against gay 'bullies'; it's shortsighted and here's why » Voodoo, snake oil, 'changing' gays: CA congressman to introduce national ban on dangerous anti-science » Because the internet exists, listen to former 'Love Connection' host Chuck Woolery rant about marriage equality » Today in least-you-can-do-ness: Billy Graham's son tweeting anti-equality prayers to SCOTUS justices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2013

Most recently, the people of Iowa retained a justice. NOM must have forgotten that.

by Jeremy Hooper

In an effort to convince the Iowa legislature that they should muck with certain kinds of citizens marriages even though those marriages are posing no harm to anyone, the National Organization For Marriage is saying this:

Screen Shot 2013-03-04 At 11.03.20 Am
SOURCE: NOM Action Alert

Only thing? While yes, NOM and a bucketload of conservative money was able to oust three justices during the conservative sweep of 2010, in the 2012 elections, Iowa voters chose to retain the lone pro-equality Supreme Court justice who was put before them. This most recent round is especially significant considering that it came during a presidential year, when turnout is much higher. it also came in an election where the man on the top of the ticket was fully our for marriage equality. It seems that this larger turnout of Iowa voters, with every reason to have marriage on the mind, cast what must be considered the more binding opinion about the state Supreme Court's performance. It's just that this most recent plebiscite doesn't aid NOM's narrative, so said narrative casts it out completely.

Typical NOM: meddling in a state to which the organization has no connection; overlooking pertinent points that get in the way of their monologue; and pretending that locals are as keen on wasting legislative time as is their own, lone, faith-motivated D.C. interest group. Iowans would be well-served to greet this hollow campaign in the spirit…

gif resizer
gif resizer

…it deserves.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails