RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2013

NOM's latest #marriagemarch speaker: Being gay is like 'playing dodge ball in a busy street,' a 'public health risk'

by Jeremy Hooper

Bob Vander Plaats once equated an LGBTQ Youth conference to "playing dodge ball in a busy street":

"Our goal at The FAMiLY LEADER is to speak the truth in love. Ironically, the upcoming 7th Annual Iowa Governor's Conference on LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bis*xual, Transgender, Questioning) Youth is exchanging truth for acceptance and tolerance of harmful behavior. As parents, we love our children so much that we do not accept or tolerate his/her desire to play dodge ball in a busy street. If we did, that tolerance could result in serious injury or worse.

In like manner, this is how I view the conference.
"

He also says that homosexuality is a public health risk akin to smoking:


(via ThinkProgress)

See much more in Bob's GLAAD Commentator Accountability Project profile.

So what does this record of crystal clear animus against the LGBT person (and not just marriage equality) earn Bob? Well, it earns him a speaking slot at the National Organization For Marriage's upcoming "March for Marriage," natch:

Screen Shot 2013-03-19 At 8.29.57 Am
Speakers [Marriage March]

Because why not? The mask is off. NOM can never again claim to be the more pragmatic, more mainstream org that it was under Maggie Gallagher (who is pointedly absent form the speaking list). NOM has reached out to the far-right, where it will forever remain.

Ya know, a lot of people have asked me if the Supreme Court will be livestreaming the hearings (which is a no, by the way). I, however, wish it would go the other way. Personally, I wish the NOM march would be livestreamed right into the court proceedings. Judging by the speaker and sponsorship lineup NOM has assembled, their march might be our side's best evidence.

Pagebreak-270

*EARLIER:

NOM adds new 'March For Marriage' speakers, further connects itself to obvious animus [G-A-Y]

NOM joins forces with Family Research Council, undeniable anti-LGBT animus [G-A-Y]

Another NOM 'Marriage March' speaker, another obvious agenda that goes beyond marriage [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails