RECENT  POSTS:  » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2013

Pro-gay artist gets NOM 'March For Marriage' ad yanked on copyright grounds

by Jeremy Hooper

The thing is, you can't just use a pro-equality artist's music in your pro-discrimination ad spots without first obtaining the artist's permission. If you do, this might happen:

Screen Shot 2013-03-19 At 8.10.17 Am

As you might remember, I informed Herzig of the usage last week, at which point she stood up strongly for the right side of history:

Screen Shot 2013-03-19 At 8.13.39 Am

Now maybe if I inform the English language of how fully NOM is misusing and abusing phrases like "protect marriage" and "family values" without either the right or capital to do so, it too will rise up and put those violations to rest.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails