RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: AFA's Fischer urges FLOTUS to fight obesity by fighting lesbians' sexual orientation » Um, but he lost to another pro-equality candidate, Tony » Video: Man misapplies personal trauma to sexual orientation science » WND's editor fundamentally misunderstands nondiscrimination law (part 3 of 3) » Video: Why is this shockingly anti-gay (among other things) speech happening in a Connecticut public school? » Fined NY event space to host same-sex wedding receptions (*but no ceremonies for anyone) » Another day, another far-right pastor pushing Christians to civil war » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2013

Pro-gay artist gets NOM 'March For Marriage' ad yanked on copyright grounds

by Jeremy Hooper

The thing is, you can't just use a pro-equality artist's music in your pro-discrimination ad spots without first obtaining the artist's permission. If you do, this might happen:

Screen Shot 2013-03-19 At 8.10.17 Am

As you might remember, I informed Herzig of the usage last week, at which point she stood up strongly for the right side of history:

Screen Shot 2013-03-19 At 8.13.39 Am

Now maybe if I inform the English language of how fully NOM is misusing and abusing phrases like "protect marriage" and "family values" without either the right or capital to do so, it too will rise up and put those violations to rest.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails